You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
Court fight over barking dogs sours neighbors

Court fight over barking dogs sours neighbors

  • 0
Only $5 for 5 months

ABINGDON, Va. — Kenny Rowe loves dogs.

But not all of his neighbors love hearing his beagles bark.

Rowe’s wife of 50 years, Carol Rowe, called her husband “just an elderly person enjoying life, and now he’s got all these problems.”

Since 1972, the Rowes have made their home near Green Spring, on the outskirts of Abingdon near South Holston Lake. All along, too, the couple has had as many as a dozen dogs.

By law, they could have more.

“I buy a 20-dog kennel license every year,” said Kenny Rowe, 72. “You could either have 20 with one license or 30 with another. You can have all the dogs you want so long as you get a license.”

Why so many dogs?

“I hunt,” Rowe said. “I’m a rabbit hunter.”

But those hunting dogs have been known to squall — day and night.

As a result, for the better part of a year, Kenny Rowe has faced visits to his home from deputies with summonses for him to appear in court and a fine that he’s willing to appeal — but not pay. Instead, he says, he’ll go to jail because the county’s noise ordinance doesn’t specifically address dogs barking, so he hasn’t violated anything.

‘Throw a fit’

Blake Baker, 55, is a former neighbor who spent 10 years within earshot of Rowes’ dog posse.

“Think about it: 10 beagles and hounds going crazy at 3 in the morning,” he said. “I don’t care if you have a box fan or a window air-conditioning unit, you’re going to hear it.”

He said other neighbors also complained about the dogs barking.

Along the way, Baker said to Kenny Rowe: “You’ve got to do something about those dogs. They constantly bark.”

For a few years, Baker and Rowe simply laughed about it, Baker said.

“But it got to the point where he added more dogs,” said Baker. “And, all of a sudden, at 3 in the morning, it would sound like they were sitting on my back porch.”

Baker began calling the Rowes with complaints. But, eventually, he said, the Rowes blocked his phone number and wouldn’t take his calls.

“And I talked to them in person about it,” Baker said.

Kenny Rowe installed some barking collars on the dogs, and that worked for a while, according to Baker, until the batteries ran out.

Eventually, Baker began complaining to the Washington County Sheriff’s Office.

“And the police would come out,” said Carol Rowe, 67. “And they would shine the beagles (with) their lights. And, of course, the dogs would throw a fit.”

Kenny Rowe tried to quell inquiries, saying that all dogs bark.

“Everybody’s got a dog,” Kenny Rowe said. “Your dog barks. You’re not going to stop him from barking.”

Baker, in turn, had a couple of dogs “that barked all the time,” Kenny Rowe said. “And I never said a word about it.”

The dogs live in a single row of kennels, where they began barking as soon as they were approached by the Rowes during a recent interview.

After a series of summonses and court dates, Kenny Rowe was headed back to the Washington County Courthouse recently to appeal being charged with having barking dogs, but the case was postponed after he hired an attorney.

Baker has since moved from the property near the Rowes, but he still plans to be there if the case goes to court.

“I owe it to the rest of the neighborhood to help alleviate the situation because, if something can be done, it needs to be done,” Baker said. “It’s not like it’s cows mooing. It’s dogs going crazy, and something needs to be done about it. It’s not fair to the other residents around him to put up with that kind of noise pollution.”

‘Asking for help’

Complaints over the barking beagles grew gradually, according to Baker.

“It wasn’t all of a sudden we started calling the cops,” Baker said. “There was this long progression of face-to-face and phone calls, asking for help.”

Baker complained about the dogs “going absolutely nuts, and nothing can be done about it.”

Eventually, the Sheriff’s Office informed Baker that the county noise ordinance was in place to keep animals quiet between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m.

The complaint against Kenny Rowe was brought under the current noise ordinance, according to County Attorney Lucy Phillips, who said the ordinance includes barking dogs in the definition of operating a device between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m.

“It is specifically designed to include animals,” Phillips said. “Most people will do what they can to not harm their neighbors.”

Still, this appears to be the first dog barking case that has gone to court, Phillips said.

The noise ordinance does have exceptions for emergencies, like using a chain saw or maintenance equipment, she added.

“Another example, separating calves and cows results in calves bawling all hours of the day until the calves get used to being on their own,” Phillips said. “That is not a violation because it is agriculture.”

Kenny Rowe said he spent $450 to implement changes to “stop the sound coming out of my kennels.”

He installed insulated kennels with closed backs and sides.

“Just the front’s open. And that’s it. And I turned the block back towards the house to kill the sound.”

The new neighbors

Robert and Anne Lough are the current owners of Baker’s former property. The couple has lived in the country throughout their 52-year marriage. And that’s why they chose this home on June 6, 2019.

“We did not notice the dogs,” said Anne Lough, 71. “We looked at it during the day.”

On the first few nights, the Loughs stayed in an Airbnb on the property: The Cottage at Stillpoint. And that’s when she noticed the dogs barking like “a cacophony,” Anne Lough said. “I didn’t even know what it was at first. It was so unreal.”

In time, she found the dogs barked “literally every night after we moved in and every morning,” she said. “They would wake me up at 3 in the morning, 4 in the morning.”

Other times, she said, “It was like an echo, a megaphone. It echoed right back into my kitchen window. We couldn’t leave our windows open or anything.”

Now, months later, the sound is more muffled, Anne Lough said, after the Rowes turned the kennels to face a shed on the property.

“It hasn’t been as bad,” she said. “They don’t wake me, but they do bark at night.”

As a neighbor to Kenny Rowe, living about a fifth of a mile away, the Loughs know this is a tough situation.

“We don’t have any animosity towards him, and I know he loves his dogs,” she said.

Still, Anne Lough worries about rentals in the Airbnb and whether the barking dogs could affect customers.

“I still find it to be invasive for guests.”

‘Ain’t no damn wonder’

On April 26, 2019, a summons was issued, but it was not delivered to the Rowes until June 6, Carol Rowe said.

On that night in June, county officers arrived at the Rowe ranch, and, according to Kenny Rowe, one officer said, “Your dogs are a’barking.”

Kenny Rowe replied, “There ain’t no damn wonder. You’re out there, shining that light around at 3 in the morning.”

Next, according to Kenny Rowe, that officer said, “Well, you can make them hush, or I’m going to call the dog pound. And they’re going to bring that little truck down here, and they’re going to back up to your kennel, and they’re going to load every one of them in the little truck.”

Kenny Rowe said he responded: “You’re going to pay hell.”

Then Rowe went out a door. The officer said he “didn’t want no trouble” and suggested Rowe “throw the dogs a bone,” Kenny Rowe said.

After that, the officers left, he said.

But the dogs remained.

‘Ain’t done anything’

Kenny Rowe went to Washington County General District Court on July 6 to face a noise ordinance charge.

“But they could not make no decision,” Carol Rowe said. “There was no law for barking dogs.”

Those charges were dismissed.

But, again, Kenny Rowe was cited with another summons accusing him of breaking the county noise ordinance.

He stood trial again in Washington County General District Court on Sept. 5, according to Carol Rowe, but it took the judge several days to make a decision.

On Sept. 24, Kenny Rowe discovered that he was found guilty of breaking the noise ordinance and ordered to pay a fine of $241.

Yet he refused to pay and chose to appeal the case.

“He is considered a criminal,” Carol Rowe said with a smile. “He’s a criminal, but he ain’t done anything. We ain’t done nothing but live here. He’s hunted his whole life. And he’s enjoyed his dogs.”

Kenny Rowe says he’s also willing to go to jail — for justice.

“You see his attitude?” Carol Rowe asked. “When we go to court, he says that if they find him guilty again, he’s going to jail because he will not pay them a dime. He didn’t break no law.”

jtennis@bristolnews.com | 276-791-0709 | @BHC_Tennis

Be the first to know

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics